Post

Science Research Writing - Results

Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English by (Glasman-Deal, 2009) takes all the credit for images and examples.

Structure

Information Flow

srw_methodology

A Model for Results

A useful writing model can be transferred, but don’t expect a perfect model.

All models are wrong, but some are useful. The famous quote about statistical models by George E.P. Box also applies to writing models.

Title

The title of this section varies in different disciplines and/or journals. Here are some options:

Option 1Option 2Option 3Option 4
Results or
Data Analysis
Results or
Data Analysis
Results and DiscussionResults or
Data Analysis
DiscussionDiscussion\(\varnothing\)Discussion and Conclusion(s)
Conclusion(s)\(\varnothing\)Conclusion(s)\(\varnothing\)

In all cases, this section reports your comments on what you found or observed. If the subtitle contains the word Discussion, it includes part/all of the Discussion.

*Look at the Guide for Authors of your target journals for choosing an appropriate subtitle.

Four Basic Components

Model Components
Part I
Revisiting the research aim and existing research
Revisiting/Expanding methodology
General overview of results
Part II
Invitation to view results
Specific/Key results in detail (with or without explanations)
Comparisons with results in other research
Comparisons with model predictions
Part III
Problem with results
Part IV
Possible implications of results

Train of Thoughts

A good writing model for the Results section should answer the following questions:

  • How do writers normally start the Results?
  • What type of information should it contain, and in what order?
  • How do writers normally end the Results?

Almost everyone writes a Results section, so it is clear that some things can be achieved only by using words. Here are some reasons why simply using graphs, tables, equations, and images is not enough:

  • You need to communicate your understanding/interpretation of the results, which your readers might not accept.
  • You need to relate your results to the aim(s) of the research.
  • Some of your results may be more interesting or significant than others, which is best communicated with words.
  • You may need to provide extra background information to explain your results.
  • You may need to compare your results with others.

Grammar and Writing Skills

Sequence

Describe the order and time sequence of what you did and found in a very precise way, such that other researchers are able to repeat your work accurately and compare their results with yours. Time sequence means how long each step took and where it occurred in the sequence. You cannot use only then or next because they only tell your readers the order but don’t provide any information about how long each event took, how soon the next event occurred, or where it occurred in the sequence.

Time sequence means how long each step took and where it occurred in the sequence.

The words and phrases that communicate sequence can be divided into eight groups:

  1. Words/Phrases refer to events that occurred before you began.
  2. Words/Phrases refer to events that mark the beginning.
  3. Words/Phrases communicate the order but do not give information about the time sequence.
  4. Words/Phrases communicate a short period of time between two events.
  5. Words/Phrases communicate a longer period of time between two events, or near the end of the sequence.
  6. Words/Phrases communicate that events occurred (almost) at the same time, or during the same time.
    • Sometimes they are also used to communicate a possible causal relationship between events.
  7. Words/Phrases refer to events that mark the end.
  8. Words/Phrases refer to events that occurred after you finished.

*The vocabulary for sequence can be found here.

Frequency

Your readers may not be able to evaluate your results appropriately if they do not know how often a particular result happened. However, frequency language is often used in a subjective or relative way. For example, if previous research indicated that a particular result was unlikely to occur at all but in your study you find it on as many as 18% of occasions, you may consider that to be a frequent occurrence. On the other hand, if previous research indicated that something is very likely to occur but in your study you find it on only 57% of occasions, you may consider that to be relatively rare.

*The vocabulary for frequency can be found here.

Quantity

The results do not speak for themselves.

If you only describe your results in numbers or percentages, which are already visible to your reader in the graph or table, your readers won’t understand the meaning of your results. For example, an event that occurred in 23% of all cases can be either communicated as a strong result (in as many as 23% of cases) or a weak result (in only 23% of cases). Failing to communicate what your results mean will hurt the logic from which the conclusions are drawn.

Here are several ways to communicate your interpretation of the results:

  • Use the language in Frequency.

    The effect was seen frequently (if you believe that 23% of cases is a strong result).

    The effect was seen occasionally (if you believe that 23% of cases is a weak result).

  • Use the quantity language and there are five groups:

    1. Make the quantity look big;

      A considerable amount of residue remained in the pipe.

    2. Make the quantity look small;

      Almost all/Almost half of the residue remained in the pipe.

    3. Emphasize how adj. the quantity is;

      The amount that remained was even higher/even lower than predicted.

    4. Communicate the quantity is similar to another;

      Almost all/Almost half of the residue remained in the pipe.

    5. Communicate the quantity, but avoid committing yourself to an interpretation.

      Some of the residue remained in the pipe.

*The vocabulary for quantity can be found here.

Causality

This part represents your understanding of the relationship between the events you observed. Causal statements, such as x caused y, are risky because they may be disproved at a later stage. In science research writing, there are several ways of reducing the responsibility of the writer when making such statements:

  1. Weaken the causal verb.
  2. Add a frequency/quantity qualifier.
  3. Use a modal verb, such as could/may/might.

They can used together, but be careful; if you use too many, the sentence may not mean very much at all.

The evidence points to the possibility that in many cases, x can contribute to certain types of y.

Vocabulary

Sequence

1. Before the beginning2. At the beginning3. Steps/Order4. After a Short Period
beforehandat firstafter/afterwardsbefore long
earlierat the beginningearliershortly after
formerlyat the startnextsoon
in advancefirstlyonce5. After a Longer Period
originallyin the beginningpreviouslyeventually
previouslyinitiallyprior toin time
prior toto begin withsecondly (etc.)later/later on
 to start withsubsequentlysubsequently
  thentowards the end
6. At the same time 7. At the end8. After the end
as/as soon asmeanwhileat the endafterwards
at that pointsimultaneouslyeventuallyeventually
at the same timestraight awayfinallyin the end
immediatelyuponlastlylater
in the meantimewhen later on
just thenwhile  

Frequency

Category I - 100%Category IVCategory IX
each/every timefrequentlyrarely
without exceptionoftenseldom
on each/every occasioncommonlyinfrequently
alwaysCategory VCategory X
invariablymore often than nothardly ever
Category IICategory VI - 50%barely ever
habituallyas often as notalmost never
as a ruleCategory VIIscarcely ever
generallysometimesCategory XI - 0%
normallyon some occasionson no occasion
usuallyat timesnot once
Category IIICategory VIIIat no time
regularlyoccasionallynever
repeatedlynow and then 
 from time to time 

Quantity

Make the Quantity Look Big

Col 1Col 2Col 3Col 4
a great deal (of)considerablenumeroussignificant
a number (of)greater (than)overupwards of
as many asmarkedplenty 
appreciablemore (than)much 
at leastmostsubstantial 

Make the Quantity Look Small

Col 1Col 2Col 3Col 4
a fewfewlessunder
a littlefewermarginal 
as few ashardlyonly 
barelyinfinitesimalslight 
belowlittlesmall 

Emphasize the Quantity

Col 1Col 2
appreciablyextremely (high/low)
by farfar (above/below)
considerablyparticularly
easily (over/under)so (high/low)
even (higher/lower)substantially
exceptionally (high/low)well (under/over)

Communicate Similarity

Col 1Col 2
approximatelylittle (i.e. close to none)
close (to)nearly
fewpractically
few (i.e. close to none)slightly
just (over/under)virtually

Communicate a Reluctance to Commit Oneself

Col 1Col 2
fairlyreasonably
in some casesrelatively
moderatesome
quitesomewhat
ratherto some extent

Causality

Weaken the causal verb

Col 1Col 2
(be) a/the cause ofcreate/(be) created
(be) a/the consequence ofderive/(be) derived
(be) a factor ineffect/(be) effected
(be) a/the result ofelicit/(be) elicited
(be) due togive rise to
accompany/(be) accompaniedgenerate/(be) generated
account for/(be) accounted forinfluence/(be) influenced
affect/(be) affectedinitiate/(be) initiated
arise fromlink/(be) linked
ascribe to/(be) ascribed tooriginate in
associate/(be) associatedproduce/(be) produced
attribute to/(be) attributed torelate/(be) related
bring about/(be) brought aboutresult from
cause/(be) causedresult in
come fromstem from
connect to/(be) connected totrigger/(be) triggered
contribute toyield
Softening a Causal Statement
It appears that…
It can/may/… (therefore) be inferred/assumed that …
It is (very/highly/extremely) probable/likely that …
It is (widely/generally) accepted that …
It is (widely/generally) accepted that …
It is/may be reasonable to suppose/assume that …
It is/may be thought/recognized/believed/felt that …
It is/may/can be assumed that …
It seems (very/highly) probable/likely that …
It seems (likely) that …
It would seem/appear that …
The evidence points to the likelihood/probability that …
The evidence suggests that …
There is a clear/good/definite/strong possibility that …
There is evidence to indicate that …
This implies/seems to imply/may imply that …
Apparently, (therefore), …
There seems to be/is a tendency to
It is thought/said/recognized that …

Reference


  1. Glasman-Deal, H. (2009). Science research writing for non-native speakers of English. World Scientific.
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.